<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>the kiZZ notes &#187; comodo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kizzx2.com/blog/index.php/tag/comodo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kizzx2.com/blog</link>
	<description>random stupid ideas from a narcissistic chode</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 16:25:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comodo: a free antivirus/firewall solution vs. ESET Smart Security</title>
		<link>http://kizzx2.com/blog/index.php/2009/01/25/comodo-a-freecool-antivirusfirewall-solution-vs-eset-smart-security/</link>
		<comments>http://kizzx2.com/blog/index.php/2009/01/25/comodo-a-freecool-antivirusfirewall-solution-vs-eset-smart-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 10:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kiZZ kiZZ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[geek stuffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antivirus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comodo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comodo sucks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firewall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kizzx2.com/blog/?p=92</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Update 2: I&#8217;ve given this product some real life usage tests. I must conclude that the antivirus component&#8217;s performance is slow, ugly and unacceptable. I was fooled by its small footprint (memory usage), but the scanning speed is slow and it effectively renders my computer unusable when I am doing any slightly more demanding operations. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Update 2: I&#8217;ve given this product some real life usage tests. I must conclude that the antivirus component&#8217;s performance is <strong>slow</strong>, <strong>ugly</strong> and <strong>unacceptable</strong>. I was fooled by its small footprint (memory usage), but the scanning speed is slow and it effectively renders my computer unusable when I am doing any slightly more demanding operations. Bottomline: Stray away from this if you want any performance at all &#8211; for that purpose, I&#8217;d say ESET AntiVirus is still the best</em></p>

<p><em>Update: Unfortunately, after some testing, I just realized Comodo&#8217;s UI still requires the use of a mouse. Although it has slightly more options than ESET&#8217;s firewall, the mandatory use of mouse still sucks.</em></p>

<p>In the past I&#8217;ve always used the commercial <a href="http://www.eset.com/products/nod32.php">NOD32</a> Antivirus. Since version 3 it has also included a firewall in the <a href="http://www.eset.com/smartsecurity/">ESET Smart Security</a>. I have been quite satisfied with NOD32 Antivirus since it has a solid detection rate and more importantly to me, very minimal use of system resources. This is unlike say Norton, which is notorious for eating up 50% of your system resources even when it is doing observably nothing.</p>

<p>Recently though, I started getting annoyed enough by ESET&#8217;s firewall&#8217;s user interface. Simply put, I&#8217;m getting really annoyed by the fact that I have to constantly click the freqently appearing pop ups. What&#8217;s worse, the pop ups <em>must</em> be clicked by a mouse &#8211; it doesn&#8217;t support using a keyboard with tabbing to the right button.</p>

<p>That&#8217;s not too bad though, after maybe <strong>a year</strong> of using it, I&#8217;ve learned of its configuration enough so that I could set up rules to prevent the pop ups from appearing so frequently, but the occassional pop ups that appear finally drove me to investigate into better solutions.</p>

<p>Then I found Comodo Internet Security &#8211; which comes with an Antivirus and a Firewall.</p>

<p>Comodo has been well known for its firewall, but the Antivirus component is the company&#8217;s new invention &#8211; this is like the reverse of ESET, which is best known for its antivirus but then expanded its market to firewall too.</p>

<p>I still haven&#8217;t used Comodo long enough to do a comprehensive review of the two, but there&#8217;s one thing that I can say for certain: Comodo&#8217;s user interface is so much nicer and provides much more options than ESET.</p>

<p>And from somewhere I&#8217;ve read, performance and low system resources usage is one of the design philosophies of the Comodo&#8217;s team. I forgot where exactly but I think I read it from the Comodo&#8217;s official forum &#8211; you can probably take a look and you&#8217;ll quickly realize how <strong>interactive</strong> the support staff are in the forum &#8211; something that blew my expectation for a free product.</p>

<p>So, give it a try for this free security product, it&#8217;s definitely not wosre, if not way better than, most of its paid counterparts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kizzx2.com/blog/index.php/2009/01/25/comodo-a-freecool-antivirusfirewall-solution-vs-eset-smart-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

